Lunchly vs. Lunchables: YouTube Giants Fumbled the Food Fight

Lunchables 2.0 or Just a Lunch Flop? The Influencer Meal Debate!

What do you get when three of YouTube's biggest creators come together to take on an iconic lunchbox staple? You get Lunchly, a product aimed at outshining Lunchables. But instead of creating a revolutionary meal option, MrBeast, Logan Paul, and KSI found themselves serving up a side of controversy.

So, what happened to Lunchly? Let’s dig into how this “better” lunchbox product crumbled under public scrutiny and social media backlash.

On September 16, 2024, Lunchly entered the scene as the brainchild of MrBeast, Logan Paul, and KSI. Promoted as a healthier and more premium alternative to Lunchables, Lunchly offered a Prime sports drink instead of Capri Sun, a Feastables bar instead of standard candy, and boasted 100% real cheese over Lunchables' processed version.

The trio positioned Lunchly as the champion of better-for-you lunch options, but things quickly took a turn.

Their marketing made one thing clear: Lunchly was here to dethrone Lunchables.

Healthier or Hype? The Claims and Criticism Begin

From the get-go, Lunchly positioned itself as a more nutritious option. On their official site, under the boldly titled “Us vs Them” section, Lunchly declared itself “Top of the Class.”

But the real question remained—was Lunchly truly better, or was it just marketing spin?

It didn’t take long for skepticism to brew, particularly around YouTube. Fans and fellow creators weren’t sold on the supposed health benefits. Even Dr. Mike, a licensed physician and popular YouTuber, criticized Lunchly for not meeting USDA nutritional standards, calling its claims misleading.

Critics on social media voiced their doubts too. On TikTok, Twitter, and Instagram, many saw Lunchly as just another “cash grab,” using MrBeast, Logan Paul, and KSI’s massive influence to sell a subpar product to kids. This wasn’t the positive reception the trio had hoped for.

DanTDM Speaks Out: The YouTuber Civil War Begins

Then came the moment that truly lit the fuse—DanTDM joined the conversation. Known and loved for his Minecraft playthroughs, Dan wasn’t one to shy away from controversy. He tweeted, “This is selling stuff for the sake of making money, simple. How does this benefit their fans?”

His criticism cut to the heart of the issue: were these YouTube superstars using their influence to push a product that didn’t offer real value?

DanTDM’s Tweet

DanTDM’s tweet went viral, and the internet exploded. His direct challenge to MrBeast, Logan Paul, and KSI sparked a YouTube civil war, with creators and fans picking sides. The battle lines were drawn.

KSI’s Dismissive Response: Adding Fuel to the Fire

In a now-infamous YouTube video titled “EVERYBODY HATES US RIGHT NOW!”, KSI did little to extinguish the flames. Instead, he mocked DanTDM’s criticism and dismissed the backlash. KSI also took to X (formerly Twitter), posting sarcastic remarks and even targeting DanTDM’s merchandise in an attempt to deflect the heat.

This aggressive stance only worsened the situation. Viewers found KSI’s responses disrespectful, and his refusal to acknowledge the real issues further tarnished Lunchly’s already shaky reputation.

In the video’s comment section, one viewer summarized the public’s growing frustration:

“Lunchly is just a copy of Lunchables, and it does NOT benefit anyone. If you want to make something, at least make it healthy instead of advertising a probably more unhealthy version to kids who can only trust the seller.”

MrBeast’s Calmer Approach: An Attempt to Defuse the Situation

While KSI fanned the flames, MrBeast took a more measured approach. In a statement posted online, he explained the goal behind Lunchly: “Lunchables sells hundreds of millions of units and countless people eat it. Our goal is to give people a better-for-you alternative.”

His calm and mature response did resonate with some, but by this point, the damage was done. The controversy had spread too far for even MrBeast’s reputation to repair it quickly.

Lessons in Brand Safety: What Went Wrong?

So, where did Lunchly go wrong?

  1. Misleading Health Claims

    By positioning Lunchly as a healthier product, the creators set high expectations that weren’t fully backed by nutritional evidence. This gap between promise and reality left a bad taste in consumers' mouths.

  2. Influencers Under Fire

    The combined star power of MrBeast, Logan Paul, and KSI wasn’t enough to shield them from criticism. The trio’s past controversies made the backlash even sharper. Consumers were quick to accuse them of exploiting their platforms for profit rather than creating genuine value.

  3. Handling Criticism Poorly

    While MrBeast maintained a calm response, KSI’s dismissive reaction showed a lack of maturity. His decision to mock fellow creators and critics worsened the situation and contributed to the collapse of Lunchly’s public image.

Can Lunchly Recover?

The question now is—can Lunchly bounce back from this? While the product itself could have had potential, the way its creators handled the backlash may have hurt it beyond repair. KSI’s dismissiveness, in particular, alienated fans who might have given Lunchly a second chance.

With the internet’s attention moving fast, Lunchly’s future remains uncertain. Will it become a staple like Lunchables, or fade into obscurity as a cautionary tale of influencer-driven marketing gone wrong?

Only time will tell.

What do you think? Is Lunchly a cash grab, or does it deserve a chance to compete with Lunchables? Share your thoughts.

Thanks for tuning in to this edition of Morning Rush! Stay inspired, keep learning, and don’t forget to share this edition with your friends and subscribe our YouTube Channel. See you next time!

Cheers,

Shubham

Reply

or to participate.